x1610 wrote:If a supplier is honnest is allways a big question.
I regret to say ,but there isnt a international standard for motor/gearbox specs.
All compagnies make there own specs after there own rules.
(dyadic gives a 1G acceleration for there scn5,but he is missing steps doing that)see old forum.
Spurgears arent 98% efficient to,between 55% and 70% normaly it depents on there stages.
Planetary gears are the most efficient from the freewheeling gearboxes.
I am able to reduce costs with a JRK21v3 50usd and pmdc servo 60usd but need to pay 150 euro for a planetary gear.
I was thinking to make a ballscrew actuator for les,but Thanos scared me with the loadcell.
@Thanos:Do i realy need loadcel feedback,even when the forces from the sim are the 50% from actuator trust force.
sorry for my bad english.
regards
Ballscrew mechanism is another type of worm-gear but linear. I don't think you can backdrive a ball screw that easy under load. The little braking that the motor applies when its off (during to its winding shorted to the ground) should be enough to hold position for the gaps of the power pulses from the motor driver.
If you can fabricate cheap balscrew with low backlash, go for it!!
Force-Dynamics for example is using ballscrew successfully in their 3DOF/4DOF systems for many years now! And they are so fast and smooth!!!
The loadcell is nothing to be scared of... It can be used along normal potentiometers or other positioning sensors, to help with the efficiency of the power side of the motor, for example to help overcome stall conditions. In general you can use loadcell to be able to deliver more or less power depending on the inertia of the mass, providing more smooth results and well spread torque across all possible positions of your actuators.
Thanos